Ledbetter had filed her case too late despite the fact that Ms. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, holding that Ms. Ledbetter’s favor and awarded her back-pay and approximately $3.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages due to the pay discrimination. Ledbetter filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). After learning of the wage discrepancy, Ms. Ledbetter had no way of knowing that she was being discriminated against in terms of her wages until she learned that the salaries of three of the male managers doing similar work was significantly higher than her salary. Many of her co-workers talked openly about the amount of overtime pay they were receiving at a time when Goodyear prohibited employees from discussing their salaries. ![]() At the plant, she faced sexual harassment and her boss told her that he did not believe a woman should work there. ![]() She worked there for almost twenty years. Lilly Ledbetter was one of a few female supervisors who worked at a Goodyear plant in Alabama. The reason for this legislation was to restore protections against pay discrimination that has been taken away in the Supreme Court’s Ledbetter v. The unfair wage gap for women and minorities to their male counterparts was addressed when President Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on January 29, 2009. This means that the statute of limitations to file a federal equal pay lawsuit begins on the date the last discriminatory paycheck, not the initial discriminatory wage decision. The Fair Pay Act extends the 180-day statute of limitations for aggrieved person to file an equal pay lawsuit with each pay check that is considered discriminatory. The bill would prohibit a team contract from preventing a student athlete from using the athlete’s name, image, or likeness for a commercial purpose when the athlete is not engaged in official team activities, as specified.The Lily Ledbetter “Fair Pay Act” is a federal law that amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to address unfair pay practices of employers throughout the country. ![]() The bill would prohibit a student athlete from entering into a contract providing compensation to the athlete for use of the athlete’s name, image, or likeness if a provision of the contract is in conflict with a provision of the athlete’s team contract. The bill would prohibit the revocation of a student’s scholarship as a result of earning compensation or obtaining legal representation as authorized under these provisions. The bill would specify that athlete agents shall comply with federal law in their relationships with student athletes. The bill would require professional representation obtained by student athletes to be from persons licensed by the state. The bill also would prohibit an athletic association, conference, or other group or organization with authority over intercollegiate athletics from preventing a postsecondary educational institution other than a community college from participating in intercollegiate athletics as a result of the compensation of a student athlete for the use of the student’s name, image, or likeness. This bill would prohibit California postsecondary educational institutions except community colleges, and every athletic association, conference, or other group or organization with authority over intercollegiate athletics, from providing a prospective intercollegiate student athlete with compensation in relation to the athlete’s name, image, or likeness, or preventing a student participating in intercollegiate athletics from earningĬompensation as a result of the use of the student’s name, image, or likeness or obtaining professional representation relating to the student’s participation in intercollegiate athletics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |